I have long prided myself on being an “atheist
Hindu” without ever going into the details of what that means. Hinduism,
with 1.15 billion adherents is the 3rd major belief system in the
world after Christianity and Islam. However, the unique feature of Hinduism
lies in the lack of a central prophet figure. In essence, Hinduism has never
been a “religion” per say. A religion is defined as “the belief in and worship
of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.” Hinduism
has refused to identify that superhuman controlling power. The varieties of
Hinduism might be as numerous as the adherent themselves. It is possible to find
two Hindus who will not agree on anything pertaining to their common religion.
Yet both will identify themselves as Hindus. What gave rise to such a
conundrum?
Hinduism has existed since ancient times when humanity was
not divided by the invisible lines of religion. Unlike the Abrahamic religions,
Hindus never viewed themselves as anything separate from another race. Mainly
because the exposure to other races was limited to trade. Hindus fought few
wars and living with outsiders was unheard of until the Mughal invasion in the
16th century. In fact, Hindus had never identified themselves as
“Hindus”. It was the outsiders who named us. And unlike other religions,
Hinduism derives its etymology from the Indus River the Persians had to cross
to reach India for the spice trade. Hindus were simply people living on the
other side of Sindhu, as the Indus was known back then. Hinduism has been more
of a geographical notion than a theological one.
It was not until the Indian independence movement in the 19th
century that the concept of Hinduism as a religion would emerge. To fight the
British there was a need of a national identity. And few things would unite the
people as a common religion. So the freedom fighters of that time carefully
carved out the common practices amongst the vast multitudes of people on the
mainland and told them that they came from a common history and were to have a
common goal. Evolution of a religion needed religious symbology. Something
which all the people could agree upon and identify with. And thus the concept
of cow worship was born. The cow was the central figure that would unite India
and give it its image in the coming centuries. The cow seemed like an
appropriate choice. The white skin gave an impression of purity. The cow was a provider
of both food and milk. It tilled the soil, and had a general motherly feeling
attached to it. But till now, I had not been convinced that Hinduism had any
relevance left in the modern era apart from being a cultural relic of a time
when traders had to cross a river and Britishers had to be swayed away. In the
21st century, the mantras and rituals did not make sense to me. What
is the point of Hinduism? Or so I thought till I took a visit outside India.
Only when I ventured out of the homeland, I realized that
the rituals that have come up as a part of the Hindu traditions made a lot of
sense in different aspects of Indian life. Somehow we mingled the unique
topology of the country with human needs and the result was certain practices
which naturally came to be a part of Hinduism. In that sense, Hinduism has been
a very absorbing religion. While
other religions have set out their laws and commandments and sought to convert
those who disagreed; Hinduism has done quite the opposite. Given the nature of
its creation, Hinduism sought to absorb the various cultures it came in contact
with. While it changed no one, people of India came to identify themselves as
Hindus simply because they weren’t required to change anything. In fact, the
religion incorporated their practices.
To give you an example of this, in 2013 I visited the
Sheshan Observatory in Shanghai. Now Shanghai city is next to the East China
Sea and as observatories go, Sheshan is at the top of a hill. Needless to say,
it was a long and enduring climb. Born and brought up in a Hindu household, and
having visited Vaishnoevi temple thrice in my life, I found it hard to resist
shouting out “Jai Maata Di” while on those Chinese steps. It was not just a way
of growing up. It was about giving yourself the strength to climb. It’s about
knowing that you’re not alone on the climb. Of course most people on the
Vaishno Devi trek make those chants without any such thoughts. They just look
to praise the Goddess. But they do not realize that it is these prayers which
gives them the strength to make the climb. Perhaps that is what happened in
ancient India. People in the Indus Valley would go through mountains together
in search of food or shelter. And while traversing through a particularly
difficult mountain pass they’d shout out in the name of their Gods. And
everyone would join them. And this would make the climb easier. The landscape
manifested itself to a practice, the practice became a cultural norm, which
eventually became a religious symbol.
Another thing I noticed in China was a fondness for incense
sticks. They don’t use it for worshiping, though they might have in the past. They
just like to incense smell. On the other hand, incense sticks are a big part of
Hindu prayer rituals. And it was strange for me to see them being used in a
non-religious setting. But perhaps that’s how it started. Hindus discovered
this amazing stick which gave off a pleasant smell as it burnt slowly, and
decided to put it in their homes. The appropriate place to put it seemed to be
close to their idols. It didn’t matter where you put it really, the smell would
spread through the house. But over the centuries incense became a religious
symbol rather than decorative art. They were no longer utility tools but pious
offerings. And they continue to be.
The practices of Hinduism might have come from
ancient times too obscure for our generation. But they come from practical
applications of the needs of the people of this land. Of course some practices
are too obscure and need to be abolished. And it is extremely difficult when
such changes are to be implemented. But they become all the more easy if we
remember that Hinduism has been more of a practice of reason than religion. Our
symbols emerged from a need of common goals. We need not divide ourselves to
keep up the symbology. Hinduism is a living religion and is subject to change.
Whenever such change is necessary and restricted, conflicts will arise. And I
hope we shall be able to take those challenges with the central idea of
Hinduism – we are all in this together.